|
|
 | | Re: It finally happened.
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Hmm. If all the skin were peeling off my hands, I think I'd be *going* to the hospital! I hope that whatever it is, you're feeling better and this doesn't happen too often. After all, I've almost finished *my* airship, so Vincent (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
| (...) Geoffrey... I have to agree with Shiri's analysis. I independently arrived at the same conclusion she did. So either we're both confused (and in similar ways), or the problem *is* consistent and admits of a logical answer which is the one we (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
| Thanks, Shiri - I think I got it right the first time. The statement I figured could possibly be true was most likely to have been correct, and after you posted, I think it is. -- Cheers ... Geoffrey Hyde Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: King, Queen & Jack
|
| The thing is, Geoffrey, that the point is not proving a, b *or* c true or false; but rather answering the question (is there, or is there not, an ace). Which is why the wording *is* actually valid... Haven't ever seen this before, but I love solving (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: "My" play goes up in a week
|
| (...) Oh, it was SO much fun. I haven't benn onstage for a year and a half, and gosh, I almost forget the rush!! Plus, I've never worked with such a small cast (7 people) which was great fun, and also meant more responsibility and spotlight on each (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
