Subject:
|
Re: Double the Fun
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 01:11:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
289 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> That sounds really really slick. But why bother? Isn't it way easier to just
> give us two buttons than put a bunch of special purpose code in place for that
> use? Don't outthink yourself, and don't try to make things foolproof, fools
> are too clever. That's my advice... KISS.
Having two buttons (rather than just one) wouldn't solve the problem that it
would solve -- i.e., the problem of accidental double-posting. Only way AFAIK
to solve that is to embed a unique code into the posting form or to compare
new incoming content with existing content....
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Double posting.
|
| (...) that (...) True. that's the only way to SOLVE it. But double posting is due to human error. This human errs because there are more steps than necessary. I claim I'd make less mistakes if the path from post initiation to return to my original (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Double the Fun
|
| (...) That sounds really really slick. But why bother? Isn't it way easier to just give us two buttons than put a bunch of special purpose code in place for that use? Don't outthink yourself, and don't try to make things foolproof, fools are too (...) (24 years ago, 1-Aug-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
