 | | Re: Football sets! —Dan Simonson
| | | | (...) stance (...) challenging (...) Actually (I happen to be an American), I was just in Australia and saw a rugby game on TV, and American football is more premitive because it is more violent. In rugby the person is just tackled, and then the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Football sets! —Marc Nelson, Jr.
| | | | | (...) deal. (...) that (...) I was referring to the historical evolution of football from soccer, and the increasing complexity from soccer to rugby to football. I don't think something is more primitive just because it is more violent. That would (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | |
