Subject:
|
Re: Thoughts on using yellow for a castle...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:01:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2049 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeff Stembel wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Eric Lind writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Eric Brouwer writes:
> > > And I believe there is also Eriq, as in Eriq La Salle from ER (Dr. Benton)
> >
> > Goodness, I'm going to have to write a new regular expression to recognize the
> > name. Let's see.... Eri((c[kh])|[ck]).(1) That works out to "Eri" followed
> > by either c followed by k or h, OR, c or k. Thus Erick, Erich, Eric, or Erik
> > are valid. Anything else strikes me as being some sort of delusional American
> > aberration (As I dislike this practice of my fellow Americans, I will
> > blissfully ignore the other forms).(2) Of course, Eri((c[kh])|[ck]) is a big
> > mouthful, whereas Eri[ck] is nice 'n friendly. I say we stick with the simple
> > version and leave it at that. See the footnotes for further Perl fun.
>
> Cool! That'll remove everyone named Aric, Ric, Ricky, Eirik, Erek, Errick,
> Rick, or Rikky from your ranks! This is, of course, assuming you removed all
> the Frederick's (and all variations) and Roderick's (and all variations) from
> your original list. ;)
How about Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thoughts on using yellow for a castle...
|
| (...) Cool! That'll remove everyone named Aric, Ric, Ricky, Eirik, Erek, Errick, Rick, or Rikky from your ranks! This is, of course, assuming you removed all the Frederick's (and all variations) and Roderick's (and all variations) from your original (...) (27 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
