Subject:
|
Re: A stupid DOS question.....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 16:29:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
413 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 22:01:42 GMT, "Richard Dee"
<richard.dee@nospam.virgin.net> wrote:
> IBM's PC DOS version 6.3....
> how many diskettes came with that release?
> 2 sets at work thrown in the rubbish, unused, which of course
> I rescued. (Might come in handy, you never know! & I no longer
> have my original DOS disks....).
> One has 3 disks, the other had 5, so obviously there are at
> least 5...........
PC-DOS?!? 6.3 ?!?!
Ewwww.
There. Now that that's off my chest: Just get a set of 6.22s -
available prolly even legally very cheap. And they're only 3 disks,
and a better dos than pc-dos :)
Jasper
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: A stupid DOS question.....
|
| (...) Didn't PC-DOS have a bunch of really cool features that MS-DOS never had, such as reliable task-switching and reliable disk compression, among other things? I'm always looking out for good replacements for MS-DOS, from the 4DOS replacement (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A stupid DOS question.....
|
| IBM's PC DOS version 6.3.... how many diskettes came with that release? 2 sets at work thrown in the rubbish, unused, which of course I rescued. (Might come in handy, you never know! & I no longer have my original DOS disks....). One has 3 disks, (...) (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
