|
|
 | | Re: CLSOTW - Thanks
|
| (...) yea, I think so too (though it was a *long* day... :-) -S (26 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: My complaint about Jasper Janssen
|
| (...) Going to publish statistics? I'm interested... ;) Jasper (26 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Good Luck everyone
|
| (...) Yah, I figured that was probably it. That was just my bit of rant for the day. (...) I haven't been able to get a Y2K problem while trying.. barney:~$ uptime 10:32am up 47 days, 11:36, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 barney:~$ date Tue (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW - Thanks
|
| (...) Technically, there was, even if it was only defined 525 years later (I think the system was generated in 526). Y'see, when Dionysus Exuugus [sp, it's late and my Latin sucks] generated the "compiled, authoritative" Christian annular calendar, (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Happy rollover!
|
| (...) It's amazing how a large heavy object can make "Y2K compliance" totally irrelevant, though. Think about it...just think...mmmm. *crunch* LFB (26 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
