|
|
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) That's 'cause you're listening to Wagner. ;) Jeff (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Cool Y2K set observations
|
| (...) Only if he's British. Since he spelt humour "humor," I think he's exempt. :) (...) Never! Fight the good fight! Like Corey Hart said (geeze, what happened to *him*?), NEVER SURRENDER! heh LFB (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Longest train?
|
| (...) I hear they'll be moving their headquarters to Florida. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| (...) In other words, they're not overweight, they're undertall! ;) Jeff (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Longest train?
|
| Not quite...it is CN and BNSF. :( although, I can see why. The Canadian railways have always had some US feeder lines (CN owned CV and GTW (CN used to be GT :) ). It makes sense, since the 2 railways in Canada compete with each other, and then the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Longest train?
|
| (...) Speaking of CP, I just heard today that BNSF (The merged Burlington Northern and Santa Fe) and Canadian Pacific are merging to form the largest network of track in the world (50,000 miles) and is to be based in Montreal. What next, Coke and (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: GATS Tampa Show...
|
| Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:Fn2noF.6Ez@lugnet.com... (...) wondering... (...) <snip> Thank you Larry. I have wanted to say that for a long time now, but never happened upon the occaision to say it. As someone who is (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote: [snip] The things *I* care about. Sheesh. (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Psh. Stupid entomologists. It's any little creepy crawly gross thing, probably invertebrate. "Insects" are a definite subset of "bugs". It's unclear how this meaning came about, but it's very likely a transfer from the other noun "bug" (the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Heh... Actually, no. I got chewed out by my sister-in-law for calling them all "bugs" - apparantly "bugs" as a term only technically applies to a specific class of insect, and not to anything else. The things entymologists care about. Sheesh. (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
