 | | Re: Household uses for LEGO
|
|
(...) Limberger? -Tom McD. radiotitan.8m.com when replying, for a brief time in 1953, Barbie heads were filled with spamcake - collectors will pay extra. (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Household uses for LEGO
|
|
(...) the L (...) belong;-) (...) Who's probably really waiting for lugnet.smart-ass.johnneal ;-) -Tom McD. radiotitan.8m.com when replying, spamcake was used as high school football uniform padding back in the 1950's in New Mexico. (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Household uses for LEGO
|
|
(...) lol check out: (URL) *That's* where you belong;-) -John (waiting for lugnet.smart-ass;) (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Household uses for LEGO
|
|
Please, Ed you are off-topic here in off-topic.fun. Please do not mention the L word here again;-) -John (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Household uses for LEGO
|
|
Several years ago we bought a new phone for the desk. However, we didn't like the phone sitting flat and needed an angled base. An 8x16 plate of blue bricks and low slopes worked perfectly. Its still in use (and I certainly don't miss the blue (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new millenium bugs me
|
|
(...) Of course, another thing people forget is that the gregorian calander was created several hundred years late and grandfathered a lot. And of course, by the opinions of (most) biblical scholars and historians, the whole thing is off by *at (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new millenium bugs me
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, YES (see below) (...) with (...) then (...) If it were only so (as a coder... I feel that all things should start at zero). Turns out that long ago there was this monk named Denny the Runt who was commisioned by the Pope to (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new millenium bugs me
|
|
(...) with (...) then (...) I just had this argument at work. There is no year zero! At midnight on dec31st is the year 1 BC it became 1 AD (though they didn't think of it as such at the time) so the first decade would look like: (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new millenium bugs me
|
|
(...) NO! (see below) (...) It's a matter of what you take as 'the first year'... The first year starts at 0 lasts to 1, second year 1-2, third year 2-3, tenth year 9-10 (since a year is a time-span it starts and ends, that is the thing you (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: new millenium bugs me
|
|
(...) Dunno about you but *I'm* partying like it's 1999 already, just like what's his name. So ya.... *knowing why* the millenium starts in 2001 is a sign of intelligence. Refusing to party this year anyway is a sign of stupidity (or (...) (26 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
