 | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —John Neal
|
| | | (...) I would like to vehemently express my dissatisfaction with your post into the wrong newsgroup. This is .fun. Your week attempt at a pun belongs into .pun. Please refrain from further post violations. Indignantly Yours, John (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) them... (...) But John, everything else he does from now on is post-violation! <GD&R> James (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | (...) I've only been here for about a year. I can't possibly be expected to read every newsgroup charter. I had no idea that what I was doing was bad. Even if I did, there's nothing wrong with one introductory message, buddy. You can just choose to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Uff-da. "pan-am-ties"? LOL -John (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) I think you should have given up the goose at this point. I wood duck out if I were you. You're just drake-ing this out, and so am I, since the meaning of canard is migrating... LFB (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 SW Lego —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) without them... (...) I were (...) canard is (...) This fowl exchange already has swan response too many, and I'm not going to suffer this mallard-y any further un-teal someone puts a stop to it! Dave! (please forgive me if this got posted (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
