Subject:
|
Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 1999 16:33:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
807 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Dee writes:
> But please demonstrate a *need* to own a gun, I still
> don't understand why you would defend the *right* to a own a
> gun without a reasonable *need*. Simply because a law says you can?
> Is there no such thing as a silly law, or a ridiculous law?
All laws are reasonable, even that one in New York(?) that says it is illegal
to have an Ice Cream cone in you pocket. ;)
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Oh, that is *so* unfair to us ice cream enthusiasts. This is cruel and unusual nourishment, and has language *specifically* addressing it in the Constitution. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Web Page
|
| On Thu, 13 May 1999 15:07:00 GMT, Lee Jorgensen uttered the following profundities... (...) I was under the impression that legislation was necessary to amend an amendment, such as a referendum. Is that not the case? (...) But please demonstrate a (...) (26 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
