 | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Matt Marshall
|
| | | yes, I meant linux/x-windows. It took forever to get it set up and I've been playing with it but haven't really seen that much I can do with it. I'm thinking about switching back to windows 95 so I can set up a network (I'm not ready to do the multi (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) A multi-os network is no problem, as long as you use TCP/IP. Your Linux box would make a nice server. (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Matt Marshall
|
| | | | not a 486 with only 12 megs of ram and a 300 meg hardrive, Linux isn't that efficient, is it?? Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) (URL) Matt Marshall $%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!! Matt's Lego Page (URL) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Linux on a 386/25 with 4 MB RAM and a 40 MB harddrive beats a Cray, right? ;-) --Todd (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) :) well, that's pushing it. Another 8 MB of RAM and 80 more of disk, and you'd have a usable system. Not very usable, but.... When the ISP I used to work for was under attack by system crackers once, we set up a system like that to server as a (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More fun linux stuff —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Sure. If you're not running X Windows, Linux will run wonderfully on such a system. (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
