 | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | (...) Chris Weeks (1) has once again explained things for the benefit of those unbelievers who didn't immediately leap to the correct conclusion... that I was speaking from an OZ perspective. Oh, you doubters, you try me so. Be of good cheer, (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | | (...) What? Have I been doing this too much of late? I just like to come up with the explanations. And isn't acolyte a piece of Catholic jargon anyway? In what way are you linked to His Holiness? (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Replying via the Internet Site - DISREGARD —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) We're both Polish? But no, acolyte is generic. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | | |
