 | | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Like shooting fish in a barrel. :) But, yes, yes I can. Why, I did't criticise any yesterday, or the day before. I let both of Sean's slide. Hey, I can quit anytime I want. (...) Creamy being good and chunky being evil? or are you a chunky (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
|
|
(...) Please rate the following statement: I believe that Larry can go a day without criticizing a poll. __ I Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Strongly Agree __ I Somewhat Less Strongly Agree __ I Agree Somewhat Less Strongly Than That __ I Thought That (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A New Poll (Re: A question of VITAL importance:)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> (...) Take off the ! and I agree with that one Dave K (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) I admit, my inherent bias crept its way into this poll. Since I don't like crunchy peanut butter, I hadn't considered that the others that like creamy (like me) would ALSO like crunchy. Let me tell ya, writing a non-biased poll ain't easy. But (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) Larry... is it time to consider switching to decaf? ;) Allan B. (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: A question of VITAL importance:
|
|
(...) It's much easier to find fault than it is to do the work itself. This is true of many things, not just LUGNET(tm) polls. (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
