 | | Re: New quarter? —Jesse Long
|
| | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <36DA1B7F.E081FE8E@v...er.net>... (...) I totally forgot about that. I don't think it's necessary. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in Deja News! (URL) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New quarter? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Relatively harmless as government boondoggles go, I guess, but certainly not necessary. (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New quarter? —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 04:51:55 GMT, Jesse Long uttered the following profundities... (...) Well, if the US Government still has enormous debt problems, they can always hold back numbers of certain states, in order to ensure "scarcity." They can then (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New quarter? —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | (...) Why do I have the feeling that at this very moment, an FBI official is comtemplating this very thing.... Stupidity tax. Jasper (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New quarter? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Better a stupidity tax than a smart tax (like income (in general)). (26 years ago, 2-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
