 | | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) It's a statement in the same vein as "I couldn't care less." The intent is clear, but the language is muddy. Is it "cannot be under- estimated" because it is so obvious as to defy underestimation, or is it impossible to have less esteem for (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Wackiness, Thy Name is Two-Headed Moose Foetus
|
|
(URL) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Just not very MUCH less (bah-dump... bump!) (...) In what way is this doom, I am wondering? (25 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Ya. Exactly. That's what I'm saying! (...) It wasn't labeled for Maggie *only*. And besides, you know I read everything. ++Lar (25 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Here's a few for Maggie:
|
|
(...) Hey, I like Shirley! But I guess that just shows to go we all have our little idiosyncrasies. (...) And I bet we'll find he could care less! (...) Larry OTOH couldn't care less! :-) Maggie (who is doomed to spend the rest of the day trying to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
