 | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| (...) Yes... even the book version of the Nazgul gave my daughter nightmares when she first read LOTR aged about 10. I can't see taking a kid younger than that to the movie if they (Nazgul) have been done right. I must say I've been put off going to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) It's possible that you and I (and probably a few others around here) are the only ones who've seen and enjoyed Barry Lyndon--a good pick, though! (...) Haven't seen that in a few years, and it's not a particular favorite for me, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship
|
| (...) Hmm... Did it have the same sky-high production values of Hitchhiker's and Dr. Hoo? Dave! (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: Fellowship on Film
|
| This is a nifty movie, no doubt, but from the perspective of a dedicated Tolkien fan, I am somewhat disappointed because much of the really important character dynamics have been neglected or underdeveloped - dynamics that are essential to the tale. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: LoTR # 1 on IMDB
|
| (...) I might have used a different metaphor, but I agree. One of my problems with the current LOTR movie is that I REALLY don't have a lot of prior knowledge of the material. Noeckel suggests that this film should be viewed as the first part of a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
