 | | Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page) —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Analysis?! Based on what? Not facts. For "rational folk", y'all seem pretty confident in things about which you know nothing, which to me sounds irrational. Further, you hold God is fictitious because you have no proof, which *certainly* (...) (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page) —Duane Hess
|
| | | | (...) Here we go again. History does have a way of repeating itself. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) **I'M** certainly not going to plow this ground again. This has been talked about here ad nauseum and I haven't the bandwidth to get into a debate about the existence of god. Suffice it to say that I'm as satisfied of his non existance as (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) I've heard that before;-) (...) The Inquisition moved to Michigan??! What a terrible imposition;-) (...) Don't look at me. **I'M** not the troll who trolled out "evil Jesus" and "fictitious god". I have no intentions of cramming anything down (...) (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Jesus is OK (was Re: New Web Page) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Tell me about it. I spend all day dodging the inquisitor. Steve (25 years ago, 21-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
