 | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | (...) I have not even BEGUN to inflate my ego! I can produce devastating walls of text in my sleep the likes of your puny brain has yet to comprehend! `, Þ Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Even awake for that matter, I suspect, as comprehending gibberish that has no underlying meaning is a bit beyond Sproat's prowess. I've got one of those gibberish generators too, though, so producing text that is incomprehensible isn't much of (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | | | (...) Well I suppose if I was doing some social engineering I could stop...but since I'm not that might be a problem. If I was social engineering anyone I would not be so straight forward and blunt in my posts. Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | (...) So why you just don't cut your holly book into two slices, and put your intellect between them and shove it all together to your holly hole, instead just losing your holly time here? If you want to debate, than debate till the end, if you (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races)) —Robert Bevens
|
| | | | (...) I tell ya, seems you guys have absolutely no sense of humor, at all. (...) There be no holly on my intellect! What do I look like, a jolly fat elf with a sack full of presents? Robert (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
