To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 936
935  |  937
Subject: 
Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 1999 16:33:24 GMT
Viewed: 
875 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Bliss writes:
On Mon, 17 May 1999 21:45:33 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:

Duane Hess <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM> wrote:
The big reason I see some value in gun licensing is that education could
become a part of the requirement to own a gun which would tremendously
increase the percentage of gun owners who are responsible.

That is my hope, belief, and aim.

Steve

This may be some common ground where we can all agree.

I can agree with the thought.  Never safe to assume that the losers
who end up making up the regulations and nit-picky junk would actually
create a program that would be effective.

True.  In which case, it would be time to change the legislation.

But, I think training which is mostly ineffective is still better than no
training.

Maybe I've been watching too much TV (entirely likely), but I have these
mental images of people walking into gun shops, buying a weapon OTC, and
thinking that they are suddenly safe from attack.  Without knowledge and
experience, they are a danger to themselves and others.

Steve

I can only hope that anyone who holds a gun has the same feelings that I
do. I have enough experience with guns (at least rifles and a few different
types of handgun) that I am confident in my own abilities to use one if
need be, but it still scares the hell out of me to know the power resting
in my hands.

I have expressed my views on gun control in other posts (I won't get into
that again since this seems to be a relatively peaceful discussion). Even
though there would still be many types of guns available which I am opposed
to, I would feel much safer knowing that the owners of such weapons actually
knew what they were doing with them. The thought of an experienced guy with
an (1)assault rifle (I'm going a little overboard here) blowing away an
intruder doesn't bother me as much as the thought of an inexperienced guy
with the same weapon wasting the intruder and three of his neighbors.

Duane

(1) No, I haven't changed my stance. I am using this example to illustrate
a point.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
 
(...) I can agree with the thought. Never safe to assume that the losers who end up making up the regulations and nit-picky junk would actually create a program that would be effective. (25 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR