Subject:
|
Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 16:05:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1056 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 17 May 1999 21:45:33 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> Duane Hess <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM> wrote:
> > > > The big reason I see some value in gun licensing is that education could
> > > > become a part of the requirement to own a gun which would tremendously
> > > > increase the percentage of gun owners who are responsible.
> > >
> > > That is my hope, belief, and aim.
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > This may be some common ground where we can all agree.
>
> I can agree with the thought. Never safe to assume that the losers
> who end up making up the regulations and nit-picky junk would actually
> create a program that would be effective.
True. In which case, it would be time to change the legislation.
But, I think training which is mostly ineffective is still better than no
training.
Maybe I've been watching too much TV (entirely likely), but I have these
mental images of people walking into gun shops, buying a weapon OTC, and
thinking that they are suddenly safe from attack. Without knowledge and
experience, they are a danger to themselves and others.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
