 | | Re: Why not Both? —Jennifer Clark
| | | | (...) Something else I find interesting is that literal creationism also seems to be almost solely the preserve of inhabitants of the US, at least from where I'm standing. The only person I've ever come across in person in the UK who professed a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why not Both? —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) The Creationist movement is primarily U.S. Protestant driven. Not exclusively, of course. Perhaps it's part of the insular nature of the U.S., especially the interior of the country. Europe has been through this all before. Bruce (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
