 | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) I have to admit, I find this a rather curious point. I know of no religion where there god must prove its/his/her self worthy of the worship of the individual. Further, I believe that if an entity, whatever it is, were able to create the whole (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) You're right. *Now* I know what I dislike about all of them! Thanks! I have the overweening pride to prefer eternal damnation to groveling to a god that is not worthy of me. (...) It's indeed irrefutable for an all powerful/creator of the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Jennifer Clark
|
| | | | (...) I think it is all relative - if our universe was the godly creation equivalent of assembling a Duplo kit then perhaps said deity would perhaps not be so deserving of respect. However, respect would certainly be true if our universe and (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) The humanity is very small part of the universe. Humanity can be good - there are just a few bugs that is all ;-) But I note your lack of confidence in you fellow man to do good - we must start a club. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
