 | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Jon Kozan
| | | | (...) have (...) level is the Big Bang theory, which has nothing to do with Darwin's theory of (...) In your experience, perhaps, but then we're all limited by our own personal experiences. Evolution and the theory of origins, and the Big Bang are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —James Brown
| | | | | | (...) Well, I don't have kids of a relevant age, but I can certainly state definitively that they were clearly seperate and not intertwined when I learned about them in school - In fact, when I took that kind of stuff, the Big Bang Theory was only (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!") —Jennifer Clark
| | | | | (...) This is not so. As pointed out in a very recent post, any cause and effect (and there may be none, some, or a lot) is unidirectional. Perhaps some explanation? First of all, let's get the temporal sequence correct, where "->" means "happened (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
