To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 894
893  |  895
Subject: 
Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 17 May 1999 14:06:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1923 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes:
> Duane Hess <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM> wrote:
> > What I will not support though is the NRAs stance that automatic and semi-
> > automatic weapons are protected under this right. What use, other than "sport
> 
> Do you think you or I can go to a gun store and buy an automatic
> weapon?  Do you know why or why not?
> 
> Do you understand what a semi-automatic weapon is?
> 
> Do you know what kind of handguns and rifles you would leave us with
> if all "automatic and semi-automatic" weapons were made to vanish?

Yes, I am very aware of the impact that this would have. That is my point.

> 
> > shooting" do these weapons have? None. They are bought and stored by
> > (generalization) paranoid individuals who feel that they need them to protect
> > their family and possesions. More often then not, the storage of these • weapons
> > is inadequate. To protect children from the fire arm stored in the house, the
> > ammunition should be stored seperately. The gun should also be equipped with • a
> > trigger lock. This protects the child from the gun, but renders the gun • useless
> > in the event of a "hostile attack from outside forces."
> 
> I don't have kids, may never have kids, so I'm not that worried about
> it.  The few times when I've had the children of others in my home
> I've always unloaded my weapons and hid them in the back of a random
> sock drawer in my (off-limits) closed bedroom.  I usually keep the
> magazines for my Glock on my person and the ammo for my .357 in a box
> on a shelf that is almost out of my reach in a closet.
> 
> People may call me paranoid for owning a weapon in the first place,
> but I think I'm sufficiently paranoid about keeping them out of the
> hands of the kids that might visit me twice a year.
> 
> > As you can see, there is a catch 22 here. Buy a gun to protect the family • from
> > intruders, but render the gun useless to protect the family from the gun.
> 
> I only have adults in my home.
> 
> > Why not buy a Doberman?
> 
> Over the weight limit for pets in my complex.
> 
> --
> Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
> www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
 
(...) Do you think you or I can go to a gun store and buy an automatic weapon? Do you know why or why not? Do you understand what a semi-automatic weapon is? Do you know what kind of handguns and rifles you would leave us with if all "automatic and (...) (27 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR