Subject:
|
Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 May 1999 03:05:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
964 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote in message ...
> Duane Hess <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM> wrote:
> > What NEED do you have for a gun? I will concede that a Doberman as well as
> > other breeds of canine can be dangerous. There are now laws which restrict
> > them too, but that isn't a Constitutional issue now is it?
>
> Nope. I don't remember an amendment about dogs.
Of course if one got down to it, one could make a constitional issue of it
since the Bill of Rights specifically indicates that it is not the sole
enumeration of rights. It is an enumeration of the rights considered so
important that they must be spelled out.
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) So it is your belief that a revolver is ok while a semi-automatic pistol like my Glock is not. What's the difference, really? I can almost guarantee you that I could kill someone with the revolver more efficiently than the Glock, if for no (...) (26 years ago, 16-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
