Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:29:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1562 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
>
> > I do believe you can understand something, even though you don't accept it.
> > Understanding is the first step to meaningful communication.
> > This is preciesly my point on evolution. Because I understand it, I can
> > better
> > see it's flaws, and then, and only then, realize that my gut reaction -
> > that it's flawed - can be substantiated.
>
> I would submit that it is *much* more likely that you don't understand
> science, the scientific method, and evolution in particular, physics
> training or no, than that evolution is flawed in the ways that you claim it
> is.
>
> Steve has made statements that show he fundamentally "doesn't get" science.
> You've said things that suggest maybe you don't either, but not quite as
> strongly.
For now, I'm proposing (in another thread you haven't touched yet) that
abiogenisis be examined critically - there I'm proposing it is impossible -
from a scientific standpoint.
And, yes, there I am proposing that the evolution theory (abiogensis) is
flawed, and science doesn't support it.
Challenge me if you will.
-Jon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism
|
| (...) I would submit that it is *much* more likely that you don't understand science, the scientific method, and evolution in particular, physics training or no, than that evolution is flawed in the ways that you claim it is. Steve has made (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
