To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8705
8704  |  8706
Subject: 
Re: guns, guns, guns (was: demographics (was: My Gun Control Rant))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:21:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1037 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

Most modern Armies are trained in urban clearance - it is a key part of
modern warfare. Personally, I fail to see how a bunch of out to shape middle
aged men can put up any sort of credible resistance, with small arms,
against a well trained military. To me, the notion that a man with pistol
can put up anything more than a token resistance is absurd.

Who is it that you think is out of shape and middle aged?

Me for one. :)

Similarly, who is it
that you think only has pistols?  In the US, it is easy to acquire military
ordnance that "fell of a truck."

Yes - but that is illegal.

While I have never engaged in such
transactions, of course, I have been aware of the possibility to purchase (at
what I would call reasonable prices) modern military machine guns, hand
grenades, and anti-personnel mines.  If little ole suburban _me_ has that kind
of exposure, then how much serious hardware must be out there and available?

It really is a worry. Neadless to say, some of your civilian countrymen have
a history of exporting these weapons to murderers across the globe.


Also, I think that you are wrongly discounting what numbers and home-turf
familiarity can mean during a skirmish.

Tell that to the Kurds. Tell that to the Kosovans. (spelling)


Naturally, all that assumes that the military would not divide. If it did
divide, the gun owning populous would be even more ineffectual.

Unless I'm missing your point, this seems patently wrong.  Assuming that the
military split because one side agreed with the revolutionaries, then they
would act as adjunct forces, synergistically augmenting their strengths.

Mountains and mole hills.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: guns, guns, guns (was: demographics (was: My Gun Control Rant))
 
(...) Who is it that you think is out of shape and middle aged? Similarly, who is it that you think only has pistols? In the US, it is easy to acquire military ordnance that "fell of a truck." While I have never engaged in such transactions, of (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR