Subject:
|
Re: Problems with Christianity
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:14:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1242 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes:
<snip>
> There is a wealth of scientific evidence that supports the current theory of
> evolution. I'd be interested to see Steve's demonstration of how it is "rotten
> to the core".
Me too. Let's see if it can be done without "junk science". I have my doubts.
> On a personal note, I find the evolutionary process amazing, and a reason to
> believe in God. To my mind, denying the glories of the universe because they
> contradict a childish interpretation of Genesis is a sacrilege greater
> than any levelled at the ultra-rationalists.
This isn't a viewpoint I agree with, but it's one that is a lot more to my
liking than strict creationism.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity
|
| (...) Question: What's "junk science"? Probably important to define it/back it up before requesting that it's not used by Steve.... Is there another thread one might use for reference of such a definition? DaveE (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Problems with Christianity
|
| (...) There is so much that is wrong in this statement I hardly know where to start. Perhaps I should say that if people feel "creationism vs evolution" is ground ploughed to desert, I'll leave my contribution at this one post. To focus the debate (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
