Subject:
|
Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 03:26:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
878 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> Call the question.
Thanks Larry....agree with most of your post except...
> militia in a free society? (or even in Canada, not quite free at this time)
> I'm confused.
Yes, you are correct. However, I must point out that we're probably the
most free non-free nation in the world. For all intents and purposes we
consider ourselves free:
...
God keep our land
Glorious and free
Oh Canada , we stand on guard for thee
Oh Canada , we stand on guard for thee
...At least that's what our anthem says....anyways I'm sure you know
that already.
--
-TiM
NB, CA
http://echofx.itgo.com
t_c_c@yahoo.com
3ch0fx
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| Well, I understand this whole debate came from the initial posting of gun control. And I agree that controlling guns may not have the desired affect upon gun related crimes, since only law-abiding citizens will register. But lately, it sounds like (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) Call the question. Are we arguing ballistics, or discussing the role of a well regulated militia in a free society? (or even in Canada, not quite free at this time) I'm confused. For the record, I concede that there is a non zero probability (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
