Subject:
|
Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:57:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
554 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > I go to the range enough that I don't often miss. But... the bullets I use
> > > go through the body and then through the wall anyway, even if I don't miss.
> > > I don't like to use something ineffectual.
> >
> > Out of curiosity, would you be equally satisfied with a hypothetical
> > non-lethal weapon that nonetheless instantly and fully incapacitated its
> > target?
>
> Yes, if coupled with tort reform so I wasn't in mortal peril of losing all
> my posessions from a lawsuit brought by a burglar or mugger.
Ugh, ain't that the truth! My father once advised me that if I ever shot
a burglar in my house who then managed to crawl outside, I should drag him
back in and shoot him again to prevent such a lawsuit.
> > > But then I fear for my life whenever I go on the road, which is all the
> > > time, since I can't take my gun with me on an airplane. So I've learned to
> > > deal with that. • **snip**
> It's a small but non zero fear. I don't think it makes my days frightful and
> lonely, it just means that I have to keep my wits about me when traveling,
> and that I can't rely on the police for protection. (but that's true at home
> as well)
Interesting. In the time between my post and yours I came up with a
light-hearted but not wholly inaccurate analogy: as a result of my
years-long incarceration in the food service industry I have gained an
unsettling awareness of how things "really work" in otherwise clean-seeming
establishments. As such, I always bear a tiny but undeniable anxiety when
eating out. I'm not incapacitated by it, but it's definitely there...
> > But they're statistically much less likely to drag a football player from
> > his car and kill him for a routine traffic stop.
>
> I agree, if we're talking NFL players. :-) However they're terrible at
> controlling the fans tendency to go on wild rampages.
I thought that was just a herd thing, like when wildebeests stampede or
something. 8^)
> Note that when I say "particularly ineffective" I'm not claiming "more
> ineffective than US police"
Ah! Good clarification!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Gun Control Rant
|
| (...) Yes, if coupled with tort reform so I wasn't in mortal peril of losing all my posessions from a lawsuit brought by a burglar or mugger. (...) It's a small but non zero fear. I don't think it makes my days frightful and lonely, it just means (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
