 | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | (...) Do we? What makes you think this? (...) Skepticism is GOOD. However, I don't think cynicism is good ;-) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (24 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) I think science/society seeks to understand "creation". I don't think being united with creation is really a global aim. That said, could it not be argued that we are part of creation? Scott A (24 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) There's merit in that argument. Certainly we are "part of the universe" since we reside in it, observe it, are affected by it, and effect things within it. The problem is that "creation" carries a connotation of it being an act of volition. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
