Subject:
|
What Would It Take? (was:Re: Problems with Christianity)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Dec 2000 21:38:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@STOPSPAMuswest.net
|
Viewed:
|
1196 times
|
| |
|
|
David Eaton wrote:
<snip>
> But again, we've reached subjectivism.
<snip>
Hey Dave, Dave! et al. You are absolutely correct. And while I find these
discussions interesting (when I am able to squeeze in the time), they are a bit
unsatisfying, because we usually talking apples and oranges here. The whole topic
of God and Christianity really isn't debatable, but the discussions which arise
out of it are very informative and interesting to me. Thank you to all who take
the time to present their views in the interest of knowledge dissemination:-)
A question (which I think I posed to TomS whose answer I can't seem to find in the
slew) I would like any atheist or agnostic to discuss would be: what would it take
for you to believe that God exists? The reason I ask is because, after having
heard all of the arguments presented here, I am left with the impression that
there is *nothing* that could make one believe in God. Is that a fair assessment?
-John
>
> DaveE
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Problems with Christianity
|
| (...) Correct me if I'm wrong Steve, but I think the argument goes something like: 'God will show Himself to you if you are faithful/willing to listen. You, posessing free will may not be open to His presentation of Himself, and even if you are (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
