| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> James
> (adding .debate back to my skip filter now - I'd forgotten what a
> sinkhole this place is)
In the consulting racket, that's what we call a "drive by"...
"I'm not interested in your discussion but I did have to put this one point
in, and now I'm ignoring you again so don't bother trying to refute it as I
won't see it"
(overstated for humorous effect)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) Yup, you're right. My bad. Doesn't make my point any less valid, though. I'll stick around like a good little boy, to see if anyone wants to refute it, or debate it. James (BTW, that looked a lot like a snipe, Lar. Albiet a friendly one. :) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Polyamory
|
| (...) (not interested in the debate, just forgot to add .debate back into my skip filter, and this caught my eye) If this is your argument against polyamory, then it's also your arguement against any kind of familial relationship. Person A = parent (...) (24 years ago, 15-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
