To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8048
8047  |  8049
Subject: 
Re: Polyamory
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 19:13:41 GMT
Viewed: 
1423 times
  
Well you can't prove the positive either, so keep an open mind on it.

Lorbaat wrote:

Prove it is NOT inborn

Jesus, Tom.  It's impossible to prove a negative.  You're intelligent enough to
know that.

eric

--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Polyamory
 
(...) So? Legal marriage is a mass of pitfalls, anyway. For example: (...) Although this is outside the question at hand, I certainly agree with this sentiment. But it illustrates my point as well, legal marriage is a fairly narrow band. And (...) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR