Subject:
|
Re: Critical Thinking
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:56:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
420 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> By his standard - the Big Bang theory wouldn't holdup either - AND it is far
> more "current" of a theory than creationism. (sigh)
The difference, without generating yet another sub-debate, is that the Big
Bang can be retroactively derived from observable and replicable events.
The Creation reported in Genesis is by definition (as you've noted) a
supernatural event that can't be reproduced (by us). It follows, therefore,
that since the Big Bang can be understood in terms of physics, even if we
don't yet have all the answers, it can be discussed in terms of empirical
evidence and scientific explanation. Genesis-Creation cannot be discussed
in these terms.
Beyond which, creationism is most certainly a current theory, though by
definition a non-scientific one, as should be evident by efforts to have
Creationism taught in public schools.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Critical Thinking
|
| (...) Speaking as a Physicist myself... (are you??) Physics cannot prove the Big Bang - any honest Physicist will admit, as do I, that it is only a _theory_, indeed, one which cannot be proven. Evidence suggests that something occurred, but evidence (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Critical Thinking
|
| (...) If you consider that creationsim has been around since Moses penned the book of Genesis - and even before that though it wasn't written down, I guess you can call creationism "current". By your standard, then, most every theory known to man is (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Critical Thinking
|
| (...) Sad fellow there. I guess that's what we get out of academia these days. He purports to add creationism to his list of "current" topics, and then requires an obviously supernatural event, to stand up to a 'replicability' test. I better get (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
