Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:53:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
979 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > I am circumcised,
>
> Me too. And actually, so is my son. It was a bad call, that his mother and I
> made in ignorance. It won't happen again.
Well, I'd hate to think that you'd circumcise the poor guy again!
I'm not sure where I come down on the whole snippage issue; the arguments
about hygiene and "healthier in the long run" just don't seem that solid. I
suppose it *is* mutilation, after all, but even as a victim of that crime I
don't feel too victimized (though how would I know...?)
> There is a _very_ strong case to be made that [the male's] sexuality [will be]>impaired. Read up, if you're interested.
Most of what I've read involved the aforementioned alleged hygiene issue
as well as impaired/altered sensitivity of the organ. I've heard nothing
conclusive regarding the actual functionality of the organ beyond that. Do
you have a link?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
