Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:55:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1074 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > I would search for a way to help them remedy the harm that they caused. If
> > they are mentally broken, I would therapise them (I suppose, by force, even
> > though I'm uncomfortable with that), and if they were too broken, I would
> > incarcerate them while letting them do whatever they could to make up for • their
> > mistakes.
>
> What if they were unrepentant? (I'm innocent!)
So what? I assume that most criminals in today's society are unrepentant.
> My point was that letting
> criminals sit around for the rest of their lives in prison with all of their • needs
> provided for and more is hardly justice
Well, that is clearly not what I advocated above, so I'm not sure why you're
pointing this out to me. They should be employed in the endevor of remedying
the injustice that they casued in their crime. If they are doing all that is
possible to make amends, then that's all you can ask for.
> Simple incarceration is not enough.
> *Forcing* them to work to make reparations is the answer, IMO.
You only force them when needed. After therapy, they will be reasonable and
will seek to remedy their wrong.
> As far as
> rehabilitation goes, I'm not sure that that is possible for such individuals.
Not sure means what? That such an attempt is worthless? Many people have
rehabilitated in prison. Many more would if that was what the prison system
was striving for.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
