Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 14:24:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
635 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John DiRienzo writes:
> The first post, about a woman's sovereignty, said nothing of why that
> sovereignty should be an issue.
That should be self-evident, and if it is not, then no amount of rational
discourse will aid your understanding.
> It was basically a wisecrack, a quip - a taunt. An uncalled for taunt which
> Simpson and others could not resist. In my view that post said nothing, but
> was only fuel to a fire - a fire that many here do not want to fan, yet
> someone did anyway.
My "wisecrack," as you call it, was an appropriately glib response to the
original glib post.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| Hi Maggie, This is debate, so that's what we'll do. "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message... (...) I'm (...) clarification. I disagree. I don't believe anyone's viewpoint will be swayed if we all keep our opinions to ourselves. I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
