Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:45:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1034 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> Okay, you are responding to opinions of two people mixed below, but I will • just
> cut to the chase, Chris. You say killing mass murderers and repeat child
> molesters is evil. How would you deal with them? Simply incarcerate them so • that
> they may enjoy 3 squares a day, free medical treatment, cable, workout • equipment,
> net access, etc, etc etc?
>
> -John
How do you deal with the first innocent person you murder???
Does that answer your question?
As I stated before, I can think of 2 cases in Canada (and several in the US)
off my head that would have lead to the death penalty (if we had it, and have
lead to it in the case of some of the US cases) where the person who was
accused, convicted, and duly "guilty", was in _no_ way the person who they were
looking for.
Fortunatly, for the cases in Canada, at least it is far easier to let someone
out of prison than trying to bring them back to life.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
