 | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | (...) Yup. (...) So? This does have, and should have, NOTHING to do with our law. From the same reasoning, we evolved for the sole 'purpose' of concentrating resources most effectively. As Neal Stephenson has put it, we are the "ultimate badass." So (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Right. And even from an evolutionary argument perspective, to argue that sex is for procreation and procreation only, is to miss how subtle evolution actually is. Humans, and many other higher animals as well, have sex a lot more than is (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
