Subject:
|
Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:57:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
623 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I too don't want to debate the broad topic of abortion, my own views are
> unclear to myself at the moment (0).
> slogans of the LP is "we're pro-choice.. on everything!"
I'm Pro-Choice, but anti-abortion. How is that for fence sitting? What it
means is, that given that my actions could bring a child into the world. I
have discussed this with my wife, and said, that given the choice I would
choose not to abort a child (meaning that _I_ believe I can support one, and
_dammed well would_) but I would a) leave it to her to make her judgement, b)
help her either way with it c) not oppose her in a judgement.
That's how I view the entire situation. Pro-Choice is exactly that, it doesn't
mean that I favor abortion. I favor people having control over there own
bodies. (and in this case, I think I would also fit into the 4.9% bracket,
Lar)
(and yes, I have done my share of marching for Pro-Choice)
James Powell
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| I too don't want to debate the broad topic of abortion, my own views are unclear to myself at the moment (0). (...) Nope. You certainly did not misinterpret. One of the unofficial slogans of the LP is "we're pro-choice.. on everything!" If you'll (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
