 | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Mike Faunce
|
| | | Words obviously spoken by a man without small kids. Barney (and Elmo) is an hour of uninterrupted time in which you can actually get something done. With Elmo or Barney gracing the screen I can supervise with one eye and be doing something else. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) How could you tell? ;-) (...) Back in the mid-90's when Barney-bashing was at its height, I remember hearing about a lot of adults *with* small children who were going crazy from all the Barneymania (uh, the adults, that is...not the kids :-). (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G3IM77.9yF@lugnet.com... (...) explain (...) The Sesame Street magazine had an article on the child psych design of Elmo's world. Each aspect of the 15 minute segment has a purpose. Adult (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | | Sorry should have been clipped to ot.debate "Rob Doucette" <rob.doucette@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:G3Ios1.G43@lugnet.com... (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Mike Faunce
|
| | | | | I'll agree there. I'd much rather have Elmo on than Barney. Heck, 3 years ago I'd be in 100% agreement with you. It's funny that me, my wife and my sister-in-law and her husband as well as many more of our DINK friends were all anti-Barney and swore (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | With the Ewoks, Leia was their advocate--she begged you to consider their good qualities. Qui-gon Jinn never had a connection with the little Gungan twerp. Plus, you could negotiate with an Ewok and they were rather intelligent. There is nothing (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) "Ewoks have survival skills"? You're talking about a race that has wood-and-leather hang gliders, which they use in dense forest, against high-tech weapons. Sounds fairly insane to me. Almost as insane as the fact that they won. Bleh. Steve (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Distaste for Jar-Jar (was: The Censors have won.) —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | (...) But you must admit they had more of an emotional range than JarJar. I remember feeling sorry for the young Ewok who was wailing over his dead parent (I assume it was a parent, if not, it was a relative or friend). Where watching TPM I felt (...) (24 years ago, 6-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
