To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6870
6869  |  6871
Subject: 
Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 21:21:23 GMT
Viewed: 
616 times
  
Larry,

I agree with you on this one.  I think the "story" could use a little less
random violence.  Yes, we all dislike Jar-Jar, and if that's so, why bother
to include this annoying character in the fantasy worlds we create?  Not
only that, but the evil ex-wife aspect came across to me as just plain mean.
Move on to better things!

Dave

Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G3G5H4.4yy@lugnet.com...
> 
> Call me a stick in the mud, and this may be an unpopular viewpoint.
> 
> I looked at this, and I looked at the earlier "Mark goes for donuts". I
> laughed a lot, both times. (I laughed at the E! jarjar mockumentary too.)
> LOTS of talent went into making these graphic comics, there is no denying • that.
> 
> And to a certain extent, all humor centers around the discomfiture,
> misfortune, or embarrassment of others or of ourselves.
> 
> But is a storyline in which the protagonists either ignore injustice or
> actively participate in it... is that storyline "good"? Is it funny, • really,
> to see the suffering of another who is being victimized because of his
> appearance, language, or (in Jar Jar's case, he's not very bright) mental
> handicap?
> 
> I just don't know. That's why I followed this up to off-topic.debate. I
> expect I am going to get some replies that say "lighten up, it's all in
> fun". Heck, I sort of feel that way myself. Something here is making me a
> bit queasy, I can't claim that I have come to grips with it exactly. There
> are no good guys, per se, in the strip, so we can't say the good guys are
> doing bad things...
> 
> Talented as this work is, and as much as it made me laugh, I am not sure I
> want to see a bunch of other works that all "celebrate" intolerance. or
> something.
> 
> Jar Jar is a sentient being (of a fantasy world) and I suspect he has • rights
> and doesn't like being beat up because he talks funny or looks funny. He
> didn't CHOOSE to look goofy, did he?
> 
> On the other hand, who am I to say what sort of work other people should
> create or not create? I dunno.
> 
> ++Lar



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR