To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6307
6306  |  6308
Subject: 
Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 18:56:55 GMT
Viewed: 
30 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Thomas Weigle writes:
Here is the crux of the problem.  The lack of diversity in minifigs IS a
political message.

Well, is it really if we consider the target audience?

I've said it before, I'll say it again: as long as the kids seem happy with
the minifigs, as long as the kids are able to use their own imagination to
bring diversity to the world of Lego as they perceive it, things are fine.

I've posted my experience on this a number of times: curiously there's rarely a
response.  Wade through the latest (down around the middle):

http://news.lugnet.com/starwars/?n=8570

Basically, your supposing that kids apply all races to the figs rather than
perceiving them as NOT representing all races.

A political message has been sent REGARDLESS of the target audience.


The overload of political messages in the world of children that we've seen
over the course of the last decade or so is quite sad. The act of playing
has been a means of understanding the world for centuries.

Part of that understanding is that people are NOT all the same in appearance.
To say they are all the same is a political statement.  All minifigs being a
uniform tone and color is just as much a political statement as making a bunch
of different colors.

Please note that you could substitute "cultural" or "racial" for "political".


Again: Luke is not yellow in the real world. Neither is Lando. If they're
both in Legoland, is that "lack of diversity" a political message or simply
a feature of Lego?

Luke (Mark Hamill) is pale.  Lando (Billy Dee Williams) is not.  Yellow is
pale.

As to the political message, your in denial.  It's the crux of the problem.


(For anyone trying to turn this into a political debate: don't waste your
energy, there are far more important battles to fight. For anyone bothered
with lack of realism: hey, get into modelling, or Hasbro/Kenner, or
whatever. This is still Lego.)

But YOU have made it a political debate just as much as anyone.

Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
 
(...) In at least one case, the lack of response is entirely because that person (me) finds the entire debate pointless and tiresome. It is a non-issue. Further responses (such as the one I am currently constructing) are a waste of breath, because (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego
 
(...) Well, is it really if we consider the target audience? I've said it before, I'll say it again: as long as the kids seem happy with the minifigs, as long as the kids are able to use their own imagination to bring diversity to the world of Lego (...) (24 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR