Subject:
|
Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:13:39 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
JSPROAT@IO.COMstopspammers
|
Viewed:
|
1357 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Weeks wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> > Why not? I mean, what makes cockfighting more violent than, say, Star Wars?
> I guess that I think Cockfighting is really absurdly bad for two
> reasons. One is because it promotes the enjoyment of pain, suffering, and
> humiliation in the human participants. I think that many of the problems in
> our world are rooted in the enjoyment of the suffering of others. The
> other reason is that it is patently immoral to force critters to fight to
> death for my amusement.
Well said.
> While StarWars contained the depiction of a certain
> amount of suffering, it was not the main point of the movie, and it was largely
> an obsticle set in place to be overcome by the characters.
I beg to differ here. How many people go to see Star Wars for the *snicker*
storyline? Most everyone I know want to see the cool weapons, the cool
starfighters, the cool battles, and the cool bad guys. How is this not
entertainment based upon the suffering of others?
> > note: I feel that cockfighting is bad, but I just haven't seen a good enough
> > explanation to justify that feeling to myself...
> Are you not opposed to slavery and murder, or do you just think that chickens
> don't count?
Oh yes, I am opposed to slavery and murder. I don't think the chickes
necessarily count because, well, they're dumb food animals. Likewise, I don't
have a fit when I step on an ant or even when I hit an animal on the road.
OTOH, see my reply to Larry's message -- I think it's still wrong, but due to
psychological reasons, and karma.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Uh, two. Including this one.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why is cockfighting bad?
|
| (...) It depends what you're looking for in a storyline. Certainly some of the story is vapid, but as a redemption myth (both Han's and Vader's), the original trilogy overall has real worth. That's why, in itself, TPM is weaker than the original (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
149 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
