Subject:
|
Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 May 2000 16:54:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
820 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> To put my stance in perspective, and I
> expect the vast majority of you to disagree, I don't feel that there is any
> moral difference between testing drugs on Negros or homosexuals (or any other
> group) and testing drugs on monkeys or cats.
Does this mean that if you contracted a life-threatening illness, you would
refuse any treatment that in large part resulted from animal testing?
If not, why not?
eric
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
| (...) No. (...) For two reasons. First, because the harm has already been done. I also assert that we should use the gains of the Nazi doctors. You can (rightly) claim that by being a consumer of that good, I'm reinforcing that behavior as (...) (24 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
| (...) Oh, OK, Thanks. :-) (...) Something that struck me while reading Ed's and Larry's responses to all this is that ultimately it's not a matter of need. We _DO_ take moral and financial responsibility for these things. If you sleep around, you (...) (24 years ago, 25-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
