 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal? —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | (...) I understood that, I have probably been influenced/corrupted by Richard Dawkins... (...) perhaps. I guess that would fall under artificial selection. I think we may be bordering on eugenics here, which has its own set of problems. (...) true, (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal? —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | (...) for further worries... (URL) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Fish :-( (was:Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) feeding (...) caught, has advocates, and will be slow to ruin the whole of the lake. I guess we'll wait and see. Chris (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I don't know. That explanation seems plausible especially given how SEAsian river fish behave given the option of a current. You have to be a pretty hard-core cichlidiot to keep track of all the different P.zebra strains. But I raised (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
