 | | positive impeachment —Christopher L. Weeks
| | | | Hi all, I was listening to the Diane Rehm show today and there was a caller after an interview with President Clinton who complained about all the time that the executive and legislative branches wasted conducting and hearing the impeachment of the (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: positive impeachment —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Been there, done that. Or at least the California Republicans have. Sorta. They had a one vote edge in one of the two state houses and were exultantant that they would finally replace the demonized Willy Brown as Speaker of the House with one (...) (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: positive impeachment —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) clogged (...) Dan Quayle for president, baby! Tanned, rested, ready, and too dim to cause any trouble. ++Lar (24 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
