Subject:
|
Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 May 2000 17:22:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
640 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Schuler wrote:
> It seems that junk science abounds in both camps, at the risk of
> obscuring the facts. Are there any independent firms performing respectable,
> legitimate research in this arena?
I work for the US Geological Survey's Climate History Team. I would say that
we our research is respectable and legitimate. I have never seen a case of
'junk science' in my two years of employ here.
For a look at our research visit:
http://chht-ntsrv.er.usgs.gov/warmclimates/
I do believe that there is more bad science coming out of the petroleum camp
then to environmental non-profits. Some very good studies on climate change's impact on biological
systems research has come out of orgs such as the Nature
Conservancy. Compare that to some of the science that comes out from industry.
I don't trust it as much as I do from other sources, maybe I will trust it in
one of the flagship journals, but not in an independent report from that
industry.
-chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why is AIDS such a big deal?
|
| (...) Pretty much everything I’ve read or seen indicates that scientists generally agree we are in a warming trend, but those scientists don’t agree on the ultimate effects of that warming. For that matter, they don’t even agree whether it’s a (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
228 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
