 | | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word) —Ed Jones
| | | | (...) at (...) did (...) defame (...) From the comments above, you clearly could not have bothered reading the news articles involving the incident and Rudy's defamation of the victim. Faulty logic on my part? Your first statement is a prime example (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word) —Scott Edward Sanburn
| | | | | Ed, Well, I did happen to read the articles, BTW. (...) I did read them, thank you, and I still say, if Rudy did something wrong, have it investigated. Which I have said before about Trafficant, etc. (...) Well, your statements like "Rudy's reign of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
